Atypical Lipomatous Tumor (ALT) Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions

SCRS Topic Header
Atypical Lipomatous Tumor (ALT) Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions
Case Study No: R-8

Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Systematic evaluation of the posterior thoraco-lumbar region was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle layers, and underlying soft tissue structures were assessed.


Clinical indication: Back Palpable lump.




Location: Right lateral dorsal wall, involving deep soft tissue.


Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue: A large predominantly hyperechoic lesion is seen measuring approximately 7.5 × 3.8 cm. The lesion shows thick internal septations and mild heterogeneity. Mild internal vascularity may be present. No obvious invasion into adjacent structures.
Muscle Layers: Underlying muscle planes appear normal in bulk and echotexture. No intramuscular extension is identified.

Fascial Planes: Fascial layers are intact with no disruption or deep extension.

Vascularity: No internal vascularity is noted on Doppler evaluation.




Impression: Features suspicious for atypical lipomatous tumor.



Recommendation: Clinical correlation is advised. Further evaluation with MRI (preferred) is recommended for detailed tissue characterization and extent assessment. Histopathological confirmation is strongly advised to exclude well-differentiated liposarcoma.




Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation of dorsal wall soft tissue lesions may be limited in accurately assessing deep extension and internal complexity.
Atypical lipomatous tumors may demonstrate heterogeneous echotexture with thick septations, nodular non-fatty components, and internal vascularity, which may not be fully characterized on ultrasound.
Features suggestive of malignancy may be underestimated on sonographic evaluation alone.
Further evaluation with MRI (preferred) is strongly recommended for precise tissue characterization and differentiation from well-differentiated liposarcoma.

Clinical correlation is essential.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.




SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Atypical Lipomatous Tumor – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound Case Study).

This evaluation was performed using Ultrasonography (USG), allowing real-time assessment of soft tissue lesions including internal architecture and vascularity.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Atypical Lipomatous Tumor – Dorsal Wall (Back Lump) on Ultrasonography (USG)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate a heterogeneous soft tissue lesion located in the subcutaneous plane of the dorsal wall, showing internal septations, variable echotexture, and possible non-fatty components, raising suspicion for an atypical lipomatous tumor. On ultrasound, such lesions may exhibit thick septa, nodularity, and internal vascularity, features that differentiate them from simple benign lipomas and warrant further evaluation. Ultrasonography provides an initial assessment; however, it has limitations in complete tissue characterization and assessment of lesion extent. MRI is strongly recommended for further evaluation and differentiation from well-differentiated liposarcoma. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation along with appropriate clinical correlation and management.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Soft Tissue Imaging
Modality: Ultrasonography (USG)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Spindle Cell / Pleomorphic Lipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions

SCRS Topic Header
Spindle Cell / Pleomorphic Lipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions
Case Study No: R-7

Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Systematic evaluation of the posterior thoraco-lumbar region was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle layers, and underlying soft tissue structures were assessed.


Clinical indication: Back Palpable lump.




Location: Right lateral dorsal wall, within subcutaneous tissue (Upper back.)


Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue: A well-defined heterogeneous lesion is seen measuring approximately 4.0 × 2.2 cm. The lesion shows mixed echogenicity with both fatty and fibrous components. Minimal internal vascularity is noted. No surrounding invasion is seen.
Muscle Layers: Underlying muscle planes appear normal in bulk and echotexture. No intramuscular extension is identified.

Fascial Planes: Fascial layers are intact with no disruption or deep extension.

Vascularity: No internal vascularity is noted on Doppler evaluation.




Impression: Features suggestive of spindle cell / pleomorphic lipoma.



Recommendation: Clinical correlation is advised. Further evaluation with MRI may be considered in case of atypical features. Histopathological confirmation is recommended for definitive diagnosis.




Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation of dorsal wall soft tissue lesions may be limited in accurately assessing deep extension and internal complexity.
Atypical lipomatous tumors may demonstrate heterogeneous echotexture with thick septations and non-fatty components, which may not be fully characterized on ultrasound.
Subtle features suggestive of malignancy, including internal nodularity and vascularity, may be underestimated on sonographic evaluation.
Further evaluation with MRI (preferred) is strongly recommended for detailed tissue characterization, extent assessment, and differentiation from well-differentiated liposarcoma.

Clinical correlation is essential.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.




SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Spindle Cell / Pleomorphic Lipoma – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound Case Study).

This evaluation was performed using Ultrasonography (USG), allowing real-time assessment of superficial soft tissue lesions and their internal characteristics.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Spindle Cell / Pleomorphic Lipoma – Dorsal Wall (Back Lump) on Ultrasonography (USG)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate a well-defined soft tissue lesion located in the subcutaneous plane of the dorsal wall, showing variable echotexture with internal linear echogenic strands, consistent with features of a spindle cell / pleomorphic lipoma. On ultrasound, these lesions may appear heterogeneous due to fibrous stromal components and can sometimes mimic atypical or more complex soft tissue lesions. Ultrasonography is useful for initial evaluation; however, it has limitations in complete tissue characterization. Further imaging with MRI may be considered in cases with atypical features or diagnostic uncertainty. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation and appropriate clinical correlation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Soft Tissue Imaging
Modality: Ultrasonography (USG)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Angiolipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions

SCRS Topic Header
Angiolipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions
Case Study No: R-6

Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Systematic evaluation of the posterior thoraco-lumbar region was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle layers, and underlying soft tissue structures were assessed.


Clinical indication: Back Palpable lump.




Location: Right lateral dorsal wall, within the subcutaneous plane.


Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue: A well-defined hyperechoic lesion is seen measuring approximately 2.8 × 1.5 cm. The lesion appears slightly heterogeneous with internal vascular channels. Color Doppler shows increased vascularity. No surrounding infiltration is seen.
Muscle Layers: Underlying muscle planes appear normal in bulk and echotexture. No intramuscular extension is identified.

Fascial Planes: Fascial layers are intact with no disruption or deep extension.

Vascularity: No internal vascularity is noted on Doppler evaluation.




Impression: Features suggestive of angiolipoma.



Recommendation: Clinical correlation is advised. Surgical excision may be considered if painful. Histopathological confirmation is recommended.




Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation of dorsal wall soft tissue lesions may be limited in deeply located components and in assessing internal vascular architecture in detail.
Small vascular channels within angiolipoma may not be fully characterized on ultrasound.
Further evaluation with MRI (preferred) or CT may be advised for better tissue characterization, extent assessment, and surgical planning if clinically indicated.

Clinical correlation is recommended.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.




SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Angiolipoma – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound Case Study).

This evaluation was performed using Ultrasonography (USG), enabling real-time assessment of superficial soft tissue lesions and their vascular characteristics.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Subcutaneous Angiolipoma – Dorsal Wall (Back Lump) on Ultrasonography (USG)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate a well-defined, predominantly hyperechoic lesion located in the subcutaneous plane of the dorsal wall, showing internal vascular components, consistent with an angiolipoma. On ultrasound, angiolipomas may exhibit mild internal vascularity on color Doppler, differentiating them from simple lipomas. The lesion typically maintains a parallel orientation to the skin surface without significant surrounding tissue infiltration. Ultrasonography serves as a useful, non-invasive modality for evaluating superficial vascular soft tissue masses; however, further imaging (MRI) may be required for detailed vascular and tissue characterization when indicated. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis and management require clinical correlation and appropriate medical consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Soft Tissue Imaging
Modality: Ultrasonography (USG)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Lipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions

SCRS Topic Header
Lipoma Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions
Case Study No: R-5

Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Systematic evaluation of the posterior thoraco-lumbar region was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle layers, and underlying soft tissue structures were assessed.


Clinical indication: Back Palpable lump.




Location: Right lateral dorsal wall, within the subcutaneous plane.


Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue: A well-defined, oval hyperechoic lesion is seen in the subcutaneous plane, measuring approximately 3.2 × 1.4 cm. The lesion is oriented parallel to the skin surface. No surrounding edema, infiltration, or skin thickening is noted.
Muscle Layers: Underlying muscle planes appear normal in bulk and echotexture. No intramuscular extension is identified.

Fascial Planes: Fascial layers are intact with no disruption or deep extension.

Vascularity: No internal vascularity is noted on Doppler evaluation.




Impression: Features are suggestive of a subcutaneous lipoma in the right lateral dorsal wall.



Recommendation: Clinical correlation is advised. Follow-up ultrasound may be considered if there is increase in size or symptoms. Surgical consultation can be considered if clinically indicated.




Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation is limited for deep-seated lesions and bony structures.
Clinical correlation and further imaging (MRI / CT) may be required depending on clinical suspicion.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.




OTHER DORSAL WALL lesions

LIPOMATOUS TUMORS








MISCELLANEOUS LIPOMA (OTHER BODY SITES)

BENIGN LIPOMATOUS CONDITIONS (COMMON SITES)







DEEP SOFT TISSUE LIPOMA







HEAD & NECK LIPOMA






THORACIC LIPOMA





CARDIAC LIPOMA




GASTROINTESTINAL LIPOMA






MUSCULOSKELETAL / OSSEOUS LIPOMA




CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM LIPOMA



GENITOURINARY LIPOMA






BREAST LIPOMA



MISCELLANEOUS LIPOMA







MASS LESIONS (LIPOMATOUS SPECTRUM)









SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Lipoma – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound Case Study).

This evaluation was performed using Ultrasonography (USG), allowing real-time assessment of superficial soft tissue structures.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Subcutaneous Lipoma – Dorsal Wall (Back Lump) on Ultrasonography (USG)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate a well-defined, hyperechoic lesion located in the subcutaneous plane of the dorsal wall, consistent with a lipoma. The lesion typically shows parallel orientation to the skin surface, absence of internal vascularity, and no surrounding soft tissue infiltration. Ultrasonography is a reliable, non-invasive modality for evaluating superficial soft tissue masses, helping differentiate benign lesions like lipoma from other pathological conditions. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis and management require clinical correlation and appropriate medical consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Soft Tissue Imaging
Modality: Ultrasonography (USG)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Hepatomegaly, Bilateral renal calculus (Nephrolithiasis)

SCRS Topic Header
Hepatomegaly, Bilateral renal calculus (Nephrolithiasis)
TAS Case Study No: R-4

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: Abdominal pain.


Liver: Liver is enlarged in size, shape, and echotexture. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. No focal lesion such as mass, cyst, or abscess is seen. PV: Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow.

Gall Bladder: Gall bladder is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. No calculus, mass, or sludge is seen. Wall thickness is normal. Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length. Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen.
Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen.

Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is well preserved. A well-defined echogenic focus measuring 4.0 mm calculus is noted, showing posterior acoustic shadowing. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No evidence of hydronephrosis or focal mass lesion is seen.
Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is well preserved. A well-defined echogenic focus measuring 6.6 mm calculus is noted, showing posterior acoustic shadowing. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No evidence of hydronephrosis or focal mass lesion is seen.

Rt. Ureter: Right ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen. Lt. Ureter: Left ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen.
Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant. Prostate: Prostate volume is within normal limits. Echotexture appears homogeneous.
Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.

Other Observations: High-frequency linear (7.5–10 MHz) probe evaluation was performed in longitudinal and transverse planes.
Lymph node: No evidence of abdominal lymphadenopathy is seen. Aorta: Abdominal aorta appears normal in course and caliber. No aneurysmal dilatation noted. Bowel: Bowel loops are unremarkable. No bowel wall thickening, dilatation, or abnormal peristalsis observed. Abdominal wall: Appears intact with no evidence of hernia or focal defect. Appendix: Not visualized; no sonographic features suggestive of acute appendicitis Inguinal region: Bilateral inguinal regions appear normal. No evidence of inguinal hernia or lymphadenopathy.

Measurement Summary:

Liver : XXX mm (Midclavicular length)
Spleen : XX mm (Bipolar length)
Right Kidney : XXX mm (Length)
Left Kidney : XXX mm (Length)
Prostate Volume : XX mL


Impression: Hepatomegaly noted.
Bilateral renal calculi (nephrolithiasis) seen with echogenic foci showing posterior acoustic shadowing.
No obvious hydronephrosis / obstructive uropathy detected (if applicable).

Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised.
Correlate with renal function tests and consider urological consultation.
Follow-up ultrasound / further imaging (if symptomatic) may be considered.


Kindly Note:

• Kindly intimate us regarding any typographical errors and submit the report for correction within 7 days.
Limitations / Technical Factors: Ultrasound has limitations in detecting small ureteric calculi and subtle bowel lesions.
Visualization of pancreas may be limited due to overlying bowel gas.
Detection of early obstruction or non-shadowing calculi may be limited.
• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.


SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Hepatomegaly with Bilateral Renal Calculi – Ultrasound Case Study.

This evaluation was performed using Ultrasonography (USG), providing real-time assessment of abdominal organs.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Hepatomegaly with Bilateral Renal Calculi on Ultrasonography (USG)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate an enlarged liver consistent with hepatomegaly, along with the presence of calculi in both kidneys (bilateral renal calculi). The renal stones may vary in size and location, with possible posterior acoustic shadowing. Ultrasonography provides a non-invasive and effective modality for evaluating liver size and renal stone disease. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis and management require clinical correlation and appropriate medical consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Abdominal Imaging
Modality: Ultrasonography (USG)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Cervical fibroid TVS

SCRS Topic Header
Bulky uterus and Cervical fibroid
TVS Case Study No: R-3

Transvaginal Sonography (TVS) – Pelvis (Female)


Technique: Transvaginal ultrasound examination performed using a high-frequency endovaginal probe (5–9 MHz). Images obtained in sagittal and transverse planes. Color Doppler applied where indicated.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: 37-year-old female presenting with pelvic pain and infertility.


Uterus: Uterus appears bulky in size and normal in position. Myometrium appears homogeneous.

A well-defined hypoechoic mass lesion is seen arising from the anterior cervical wall, measuring 39.5 × 47.7 mm, suggestive of a cervical fibroid. The lesion shows smooth margins with no obvious cystic degeneration or calcification.
Endometrium: Endometrial echo complex appears within normal limits for age and menstrual phase.
Right Ovary: Right ovary is normal in size and echotexture. Follicles are seen. No adnexal mass lesion noted. Left Ovary: Left ovary is normal in size and echotexture. Follicles are seen. No cyst or solid lesion noted. Pouch of Douglas (POD): No free fluid is seen.


Measurement Summary:

Uterus : 99 × 47 × 45 mm
Cervical Fibroid : 39.5 × 47.7 mm




Impression: Bulky uterus with a well-defined hypoechoic lesion arising from the anterior cervical wall, consistent with a cervical fibroid.

Recommendation: Gynecological consultation and clinical correlation advised.


Kindly Note:

• Kindly intimate us regarding any typographical errors within 7 days.
• Ultrasound has limitations in detecting small pelvic lesions.
• TVS provides better resolution for pelvic structures.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.


SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Bulky Uterus with Cervical Fibroid – TVS Case Study.

This evaluation was performed using Transvaginal Sonography (TVS), providing high-resolution assessment of pelvic structures.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Bulky Uterus with Anterior Cervical Fibroid on Transvaginal Sonography (TVS)” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The findings demonstrate a bulky uterus with a well-defined fibroid arising from the anterior cervical wall, measuring approximately 45.5 × 47.7 mm. TVS provides superior resolution for evaluation of uterine and cervical pathology. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration only. Definitive diagnosis and management require clinical correlation and gynecological consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Gynecological Imaging
Modality: Transvaginal Sonography (TVS)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Bulky uterus Cervical fibroid

SCRS Topic Header
Bulky uterus and Cervical fibroid
L/A / Pelvis ultrasound Case Study No: R-2

Lower Abdomen or Pelvis Sonography (Female)


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Transabdominal pelvic scan performed with adequately filled urinary bladder. Longitudinal and transverse sections obtained. Color Doppler used where required.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: 37y old patient present with pelvic pain and infertility


Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. No post-void residual urine. Uterus: Uterus is bulky in size, shape, and position. Myometrium appears homogeneous.

Endometrium: Endometrial echo complex appears normal for age and menstrual phase. Endometrial thickness is within normal limits.
The cervix shows a well-defined hypoechoic mass lesion arising from the anterior cervical wall, measuring 45.5 × 47.7 mm. The lesion appears solid with smooth margins. No obvious cystic degeneration or calcification is noted.

Right Ovary: Right ovary is normal in size and echotexture. Follicles are seen. No cyst or solid lesion noted. Left Ovary: Left ovary is normal in size and echotexture. Follicles are seen. No cyst or solid lesion noted. Adnexa: No adnexal mass or lesion is seen bilaterally. Pouch of Douglas (POD): No free fluid is seen.


Measurement Summary:

Uterus : 110 × 47 × 55 mm
Cevical fibroid : 47.7 × 45.5 mm




Impression: Bulky uterus noted. A well-defined mass is seen arising from the anterior cervical wall,considered to cervical fibroid.

Recommendation: Gynecological consultation and clinical correlation advised.


Kindly Note:

• Kindly intimate us regarding any typographical errors within 7 days.
• Ultrasound has limitations in detecting small pelvic lesions.
• Transvaginal scan may provide better evaluation if clinically indicated.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.


SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Bulky Uterus with Cervical Fibroid – Ultrasound Case Study.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Bulky Uterus with Anterior Cervical Fibroid on Ultrasound” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The sonographic findings demonstrate a bulky uterus with a well-defined fibroid arising from the anterior cervical wall measuring approximately 45.5 × 47.7 mm. These findings are intended for learning and demonstration purposes only. Definitive diagnosis and management require clinical correlation and gynecological consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography & Gynecological Imaging
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Right renal cortical cyst, Bulky uterus, RPOC, and Left ovarian follicular cyst.

SCRS Topic Header
Right renal cortical cyst, Bulky uterus, RPOC, and Left ovarian follicular cyst
W/A Female ultrasound Case Study No: R-1

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: 32y old Patient presents with abdominal pain; evaluation for right renal cortical cyst


Liver: Liver is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. No focal lesion such as mass, cyst, or abscess is seen. PV: Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow.

Gall Bladder: Gallbladder is not visualized, consistent with post-cholecystectomy status. Gallbladder fossa appears clear with no evidence of fluid collection, mass, or residual tissue. Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length. Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen.
Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen.
Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. A well-defined anechoic cortical cyst measuring 15.0 × 15.6 mm is noted in the lower cortex. No internal septation or solid component is seen. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is noted.
Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen.

Rt. Ureter: No evidence of dilatation. Lt. Ureter: No evidence of dilatation.
Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant. Uterus: Uterus is anteverted and appears bulky in size with normal myometrial echotexture.
Endometrial cavity shows heterogeneous echogenic contents suggestive of retained products of conception (RPOC). Endometrial thickness is increased.
No focal myometrial lesion is seen. Overall echotexture appears mildly heterogeneous.
Rt. Ovary: Normal in size and priserved echotexture. No cyst or mass lesion. Lt. Ovary: Left ovary is normal in size with preserved echotexture. A well-defined thin-walled anechoic cyst (follicular cyst) measuring 21 × 19 mm is seen. No internal septation or solid component is noted. No adnexal mass lesion is seen.
Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.

Other Observations: High-frequency linear (7.5–10 MHz) probe evaluation was performed in longitudinal and transverse planes.
Lymph node: No evidence of abdominal lymphadenopathy is seen. Aorta: Abdominal aorta appears normal in course and caliber. No aneurysmal dilatation noted. Bowel: Bowel loops are unremarkable. No bowel wall thickening, dilatation, or abnormal peristalsis observed. Abdominal wall: Appears intact with no evidence of hernia or focal defect. Appendix: Not visualized. Inguinal region: Bilateral inguinal regions appear normal. No evidence of inguinal hernia or lymphadenopathy.

Measurement Summary:

Liver : 129.6 mm (Midclavicular length)
Spleen : 95.6 mm (Bipolar length)
Right Kidney : 98.2 mm (Length)
Left Kidney : 102.3 mm (Length)
Uterus Volume : 98.2 mL


Impression: Status post cholecystectomy with no obvious complication.
Right renal cortical cyst noted.
Bulky uterus with retained products of conception (RPOC).
Left ovarian simple follicular cyst.


Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised. Gynecological consultation is recommended for further evaluation and management of RPOC. Follow-up ultrasound may be considered if clinically indicated.


Kindly Note:

• Kindly intimate us regarding any typographical errors and submit the report for correction within 7 days.

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound is not the modality of choice to rule out subtle bowel lesions.
Examination of the pancreas was partially limited due to overlying bowel gas.
Evaluation of uterus and adnexa may be limited in cases of inadequate bladder filling, bowel gas, or obesity; transvaginal ultrasound provides better resolution when clinically indicated.

• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.


SCRS End Page

End of Case Study

You have reached the end of this Combined Abdomino-Pelvic Ultrasound Case Study.

Findings include Right Renal Cortical Cyst, Bulky Uterus, Retained Products of Conception (RPOC), and Left Ovarian Follicular Cyst.

Content is intended for educational, training, and clinical reference only.

Author Photo

Declaration:
I, R. K. Mouj, declare that the material presented in this case study titled “Right Renal Cortical Cyst with Bulky Uterus, RPOC, and Left Ovarian Follicular Cyst on Ultrasound” has been prepared solely for educational and academic purposes. The sonographic findings demonstrate a simple cortical cyst in the right kidney, bulky uterus with intrauterine echogenic contents suggestive of RPOC, and a left ovarian follicular cyst. These observations are intended for learning and demonstration only. Final diagnosis and management require clinical correlation, laboratory evaluation, and specialist consultation.

Author: ____________________
Name: R. K. Mouj [Radio-imaging Technologist]
Domain: Diagnostic Sonography (Abdominal & Gynecological Imaging)
Platform: SonoAcademy
Supervisor / Guide: Department Radiologist
Department: Radiology

⬆ Back to Top
© SCRS – Sonographic Classified Reporting System

Atypical Lipomatous Tumor (ALT) Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions

SCRS Topic Header Atypical Lipomatous Tumor (ALT) Back lump ultrasound – dorsal wall lesions ...

Popular post